The Cranfield Master of Research dissertations are not empirical research but systematic reviews of the literature, and as such are great examples of how to go about a systematic review. Consequently I'm low that I didn't tackle my literature review this way at the start of this academic year.
Now though I am imagining all the things that won't come together, the important literature I won't find and how to write it up coherently.
This blog is of doctoral study at the Open University Business School (OUBS)in the UK, of how public organisations work with their external third party suppliers on IT projects. The research aims to investigate how engagement contributes and influences relationships between clients and consultants and if engagement helps deliver value to a project.
About Me
- eLizH
- Boomer! My business card says I'm a university researcher but another card would say: associate lecturer, tutor, teacher, volunteer, wife, mother, stepmother and grandmother. Or choir member, or glider pilot, or that I have my black belt 2nd Dan in tae kwon do
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(171)
-
▼
July
(19)
- Advice
- Ethics approval
- Working hypotheses
- The question of engagement
- Too much to read
- Engagement
- NVivo difficulties
- Systematic review again
- Mini-viva
- Systematic review
- New! from Cranfield
- Wrong language
- Learning & systems
- Template analysis course
- Qualitative analysis
- Argument for research question
- Robin Wilson
- Careers
- OUBS research week - publishing
-
▼
July
(19)
Pages
Sometimes blogging
Blogging with discipline
No comments:
Post a Comment