- Sureyya Cansoy, Associate Director, Intellect
- John Collington, Group Commercial Director, Home Office
- Toby Stevens, Director, Enterprise Privacy Group
- trust has been broken (statistical proof exists)
- recognise the need for action by government and IT industry to restore that broken trust
- benefits come from information sharing. e.g, the DVLA can access your passport photo so you don't need to entrust your passport to the vagaries of the post
- the required data
- processes
- company
- the person (who lost her job)
Questions came from
- William Heath from Ctrl-Shift Ltd on the wrong way to share data
- Brian Williams from Innovation
- Roger Goss Co-director Patient Concern
This debate itself was interesting, but even more interesting was the chap I sat next to who is heavily against Phorm. Since my students have just had to write an essay on Phorm, it was particularly interesting to hear his views. He runs a web site http://www.inphormationdesk.org arguing that the key issue is the immense potential for harm offered by the unfettered interception of web communications.
"If the Royal Mail offered a service which opened letters in order to improve the quality of junk mail, then you would instinctively know it was wrong and appreciate its future risks. Phorm’s offering is no different."He also offered to keep in touch to help me with my research, so I'm extra pleased.
1 comment:
I was looking at your blog as a consequence of Angela telling me of your email re PGRs gaining teaching experience (I'm currently the Academic Co-ordinator in the Research School).
Anyway - I see you mention the dreaded Phorm, who keep hanging in there with further injections of money! That's a nice analogy of the Royal Mail.
Robert
Post a Comment