Sunday 29 June 2008

Feedback

Supervisor has read my proposal & suggests:
  • rewrite the introduction - Supervisor has attacked it and written five sentences that bring the argument together - why didn't I write like that?
  • sort out month numbers with real dates - good idea, I didn't like the numbers anyhow.
  • reconsider which life cycle model to use - yes - the one I'm using is perhaps too simple for the context
  • I be less casual - whoops!
  • also have to work out some points of clarity
Nevertheless, perhaps I have a "robust" research question. Yeah!

No comments: