Something's bugging me. It's how to match the research questions to the answers I got to my interview questions. But my interview questions were framed round the Nahapiet & Ghoshal paper, not around my research questions.
I happened to mention this niggle to my third party monitor. She asked questions about my approach, the methodology I'm using, or my research strategy for making sense of the data in order to work out where I am. She suggests I write the methodology chapter now, as a story of how I done it. She knows I'm interested in story telling and narrative analysis and suggested some reading, including looking at the methodology chapters of recent PhDs, especially from Lancaster where they stress methodology.
It was a really helpful discussion - beyond what a third party monitor's brief might be - and I'm grateful for the time and suggestions.
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) 'Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage', Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), pp. 242-266. 842
PS. The bug in the photo is a wood-louse spider.
Wednesday, 18 February 2009
Methodology
Labels:
3pm,
bug,
interview questions,
Lancaster,
photo,
research question,
research strategy,
spider,
story,
woodlouse
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment